Ever since the advent of the infamous “Chappelle’s Show”
I’ve been a huge fan of Dave’s material. In one of his standup specials For What It’s Worth, Dave includes a
segment talking about the R. Kelly sex scandal- there was a videotape that had
allegedly showed R. Kelly engaging in sex and urinating on a 15-year-old girl.
Of course this is nothing to be joked about, and though Dave does include this
information in his standup, the message and comical essence to it all involves
a much bigger picture. Dave isn’t debating the innocence or guiltiness of R.
Kelly, but instead delves into the matter of age borders, and moreover the
haziness between them. For those of you that want a more detailed synopsis of
the segment, watch the video below- it’s both hilarious and also thought
provoking.
As
you may have seen, Dave provides individual accounts of four children, or young
adults as some may look at it. The first of which you’ve already been told
about- the 15-year-old-girl involved in the aforementioned scandal. Then Dave
asks us the question that he deems the most crucial point to be raised amongst
all of this- “How old is 15 really?” To elaborate on his intent, Dave
introduces to us another teenager- 14-year-old Elizabeth Smart. Elizabeth was
kidnapped and held captive for 6 months. While all of this is happening, enter
subject #3: an unnamed African American 7-year-old girl who was also kidnapped
during this time in Philadelphia. Despite their age, another difference between
these two unfortunate girls is their amount of time held captive. While her
captives held Elizabeth for 6 months, the 7-year-old escaped and made it home
in the same day. Here, Dave begins to subtly introduce us to the ambiguity of
age borders. When it comes to comparing a young child in elementary school
versus a teenager entering high school, society undoubtedly places a border
between them. For instance, the most obvious, society expects more out of the
teenager and less out of the younger child. If a young child makes a mistake,
it is considered venial, whereas the teenager should have known better. Before
I go any further, it’s important to note that Dave isn’t poking fun at
Elizabeth for getting kidnapped- as he says “that could happened to anybody.”
However, what he is pointing out is the irony of the younger girl proving more
adaptive and daring than her older counterpart (especially noting that
Elizabeth wasn’t restrained, when the younger girl was, and she was also
relatively close to her home). He shows us that these stories don’t coincide
with the borders society places between two age groups. This comparison is only
the beginning of a very blurred border.
Next,
Dave tells us the story of a
15-year-old African American boy. One day, he was with his neighbor and was
practicing wrestling moves he saw on TV. While doing so, the boy accidentally
breaks the neighbor’s neck and kills him. Consequentially, the boy was
sentenced to life in prison. This is the biggest discrepancy of them all. In
Elizabeth Smart’s case, they treated her as an innocent, naïve teenager (even
though a girl much younger than her was put in a similar predicament and got
away), but for this boy, he was treated as an adult.
The
take home point here is that age borders lack clarity and distinction. How can
we see one fifteen year old with youthful innocence, and yet see another with
hardened malice? This incongruity gives rise to such an unclear border. Society
has falsely attributed these borders by inherently underestimating the
capabilities of a 7-year-old and also overestimating the intentions of a
15-year-old. The lacking consistency of these borders creates much confusion as
to how to treat people of certain ages, and to what expectations to hold them. If
we’re going to have age borders, they need to be clearly defined, and most
importantly consistent, or else there is no border at all.
As
an ending note, I hope this did not come off as cruel or insensitive, as that
was not my intention by any means. I just found this segment interesting as it
brings up a border with some holes in it.
Dave Chappelle is definitely one of the funniest comedians today. I think this because of how he tells jokes from the material he uses. He brings up stories or creates skits that involve many different stereotypes. While they may be funny, Dave's jokes constantly cross the line. This line he crosses is a metaphorical border. In my opinion, I would call this the appropriate vs. inappropriate border.
ReplyDeleteI did not find this post offensive, I thought it was a brave post about an interesting topic. Dave Chappelle is known for his offensive comedy. He will say anything to make people laugh, or even cringe as his crude humor. I thought it was interesting how Dennis linked Chappelle's inappropriate humor with an age border. To link this age border to what we have read this semester it is easy to link Mattie to this post. Mattie does not seem to fall into the category of an immature young girl. She breaks the border that is usually drawn between childhood and adulthood.
ReplyDelete